“It suggests that at least in the region we looked, this is a more general problem than people expected,” Jackson told ProPublica.įor those who live in the midst of this problem, the report serves as long-awaited vindication. But the consistency of the Duke findings raises questions about how unusual and widespread such cases of methane contamination may be. ![]() The drilling industry and some state regulators described some of these cases as “anecdotal” and said they were either unconnected to drilling activity or were an isolated problem. In at least a dozen cases in Colorado, ProPublica’s investigation found, methane had infiltrated drinking water supplies that residents said were clean until hydraulic fracturing was performed nearby. In Dimock, Pa., where part of the Duke study was performed, some residents’ water wells exploded, or their water could be lit on fire. ![]() In Pennsylvania a 2004 accident killed three people, including a baby. In several cases, homes blew up after gas seeped into their basements or water supplies. A 2009 investigation by ProPublica revealed that methane contamination from drilling was widespread, including in Colorado, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Methane contamination of drinking water wells has been a common complaint among people living in gas drilling areas across the country. That was a real surprise,” said Robert Jackson, a biology professor at Duke and one of the report’s authors. “We certainly didn’t expect to see such a strong relationship between the concentration of methane in water and the nearest gas wells. The researchers did not find evidence that the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing had contaminated any of the wells they tested, allaying for the time being some of the greatest fears among environmentalists and drilling opponents.īut they were alarmed by what they described as a clear correlation between drilling activity and the seepage of gas contaminants underground, a danger in itself and evidence that pathways do exist for contaminants to migrate deep within the earth. Department of Interior says is dangerous and requires urgent “hazard mitigation” action, according to the study. The average concentration of the methane detected in the water wells near drilling sites fell squarely within a range that the U.S. The group defined an active drilling area as within one kilometer, or about six tenths of a mile, from a gas well. While most of the wells had some methane, the water samples taken closest to the gas wells had on average 17 times the levels detected in wells further from active drilling. Sixty of those wells were tested for dissolved gas. The group tested 68 drinking water wells in the Marcellus and Utica shale drilling areas in northeastern Pennsylvania and southern New York State. “Our results show evidence for methane contamination of shallow drinking water systems in at least three areas of the region and suggest important environmental risks accompanying shale gas exploration worldwide,” the article states. They also found that the type of gas detected at high levels in the water was the same type of gas that energy companies were extracting from thousands of feet underground, strongly implying that the gas may be seeping underground through natural or manmade faults and fractures, or coming from cracks in the well structure itself. ![]() They found that levels of flammable methane gas in drinking water wells increased to dangerous levels when those water supplies were close to natural gas wells. The research was conducted by four scientists at Duke University. The peer-reviewed study, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, stands to shape the contentious debate over whether drilling is safe and begins to fill an information gap that has made it difficult for lawmakers and the public to understand the risks. For the first time, a scientific study has linked natural gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing with a pattern of drinking water contamination so severe that some faucets can be lit on fire.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |